| |
Address at the 1st National Forum on Climate
Change
Phnom Penh, October 19, 2009
Your Venerable Monks,
Your Excellency Douglas Broderick, UN Coordinator in Cambodia,
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Dear all Participants and Students,
Today, it is my
privilege and pleasure to participate the 1st National Forum on
Climate Change. I would like to extend my warm welcome to distinguished
national and international representatives of the senate, the national assembly,
government’s ministries and institutions, development partners, ambassadors to
the Kingdom of Cambodia, NGOs, private sector, educational institutions, and all
the participants.
As we already
know, during the 1992 summit of the world leaders in Rio de Janeiro on
sustainable development and the 21st agenda for guiding the world
towards sustainable and equitable development, Cambodia was locked in the
national reunification effort.
The 1993
Election, supported by the UN, gave birth to a coalition government but the
civil war still existed. However, Cambodia managed to integrate itself into the
international community and took part in addressing global issues.
In particular,
Cambodia signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in
1995 which reflected its awareness on the issue as well as its determination and
responsibility in the global effort to tackle climate change.
It was not until
1998 that Cambodia enjoyed the complete national peace and political stability
for the first time during the last four decades, thanks to the Royal
Government’s “Win-Win” policy and political will as well as
determination in the cause of national unification. Currently, Cambodian people
are striving to restore socio-economic development to improve the living
standard and ensure national sustainable development, as stated in the Rectangular Strategy Phase II. We are implementing the task under the
theme of “Climate Change” which cannot be ignored in the national development
agenda and international relation.
This factor does
not only require us to reconsider our national development plan and traditional
methods in development effort, we must transform it into an opportunity for
underpinning sustainable development in the face climate change.
In this spirit,
the organization of the 1st National Forum on Climate Change is another crossroad in the history of Cambodia. This forum is a critical event
and allows us to share information and experience with other regional countries.
We can also exchange dialogue on critical issues and measures to tackle climate
change and embed it in the formulation of national policies and plans, future
implementation of various international agreements on climate change, financing
for developing countries, transfer of technologies, emergency funding for the
most vulnerable countries, especially adaptation measures and capacity building.
I would like to take this opportunity to extend my profound gratitude to
particular development partners and NGOs for supporting this important forum and
taking part in tackling climate change.
The three main
challenges of climate change are: increasing temperature, changes of rain
patterns, changes of sea level which have direct and strong impact to least
developing countries. As a country that just recovered from the civil war, and
with limited development progress, Cambodia is vulnerable to the climate change,
because Cambodia is a agricultural country with the majority of the population
depend upon the agricultural products and other natural resources for their
daily living. As stated clearly in Khmer proverb “Farming requires water,
fighting requires food supply”, that is importance for our agriculture
sector, our living and as well as the entire national development. Rice and Fish is our staple food, traditional and strategic. Within this
context, the impacts caused by the climate change for agriculture, water
resources, fisheries and people health and others will lead to severe food
security and socio-economic development problems, as we have limited resources
technically, financially and institutionally in response to the climate change.
The Royal
Government of Cambodia, as a signatory of the United Nations Convention on
Climate Change and Kyoto Protocols, Cambodia is fully aware of the impact
and will continue to do its best to implement this convention and protocol. In
fact, in reducing the greenhouse effects we have implemented many Win-Win measures to support the sustainable development such as clean project mechanism,
promotion of renewable energy, campaign on oil and energy saving, conservation
of forest in national natural reserves and protected forest areas as well as
voluntary activities of the private sector in the promotion of the use of
renewable energy from agriculture wastes for their production, especially the
use of bio-energy, rice husk and bio-gas for electricity production and cooking
at the rural areas.
In forestry
sector, we have implemented some projects by the forestry administration to
reduce the greenhouse effects by the mitigation of the lose of forest,
degradation of forest, preservation of forest as well as raising the living
standard of the community within the projects whether inside or outside the
national natural resources protected areas.
For the
adaptation of climate change measures, the Royal Government of Cambodia has
implemented program activities of adaptation of climate change in late 2006,
which has 39 projects for implementation to response to immediate needs of
communities to adapt themselves with climate change.
In agricultural
sector, as I have already mentioned earlier, the climate changes, hence, it is
necessary to change the practice of our farmers which has been traditionally
carrying out, basically from rice transplanting to the use of rice seeds.
Otherwise, we would not be able to ensure food security and development.
RGC is paying
great attention on the institutional capacity development. In 2006, we have
established National Committee for the Management of Climate Change that is an
inter-governmental institution having comprehensive mission related to policy
formulation, coordination, enhancement of corporation etc., particularly in
climate change. Recently, I accepted the request for chairing this international
committee, which is a testimony of great attention of RGC on climate change
because it is not only an environmental issue or separated sector, but a
development issue that has inter-sectors in behavior and multi skills that
involve duty of national ministries.
This national
committee must primarily focus on mainstreaming of climate change into relevant
sectors especially agriculture; water resources; forestry; industry and energy
and health ensuring the sustainable agricultural development; growth of rice
production; food security; sustainable development of industrial sector and
energy; reduction of import of oil; the sustainable development of water
resources and land; development of tourisms sector; culture and nature; the
people’s health care and the construction of infrastructure that endure the
condition of the changes of weather. At the same time, the important task is to
strengthen the capacity of this secretariat that consists of professionals
having work experience, technical ability and skilful management capacity from
relevant ministries and institutions, aiming at ensuring effective operation and
sustainable task of this national committee. In this regard, I would like to
call for an increasing support and facilitation from all Development Partners
with this national committee that is an RGC’s level official institution for
policy framework, ensuring ownership and response to the specific need of
Cambodia.
Climate change
is a great challenge facing the world that has strong potential changing the
development of human civilization, if we do not take serious and timely measure
to cope with it. This issue does not stop at particular boundary of one nation
because the world has only one atmosphere. Therefore, both rich and poor
countries are affected by climate change. Unfortunately, poor countries are the
ones that mostly affected from the crisis that was originated elsewhere, because
they have very little resources to cope with climate change. Very often,
governments of poor countries have very limited intervention through rescue
operation and relief efforts after the crisis already occurred. As for those
poor people they only have to endure the hardship from climate change. Indeed,
those people have become accustomed to the loss of lives, properties, and crops
every year, however, this adaptation can be considered as unsuccessful. This has
created a moral issue for the world. Who is responsible for victims of climate
change at Bangladesh’s Mekong Delta or those millions of people living on small
remote islands who will lose their homes from rising sea level? Actually, those
developed countries who created the problem in the first place should show more
remorse and be the first to take accepted responsibility for their past and
current deeds as stated in the United Nations framework Convention on Climate
Change. This is a karma for enjoying happiness and
prosperity over someone else’ sorrow, especially, when it is done
intentionally.
In two months,
world leaders will convene for the 15th time in Copenhagen,
Denmark to seek solutions for climate change by discussing on the
creation of a new agreement after the end of the first phase of Kyoto
Protocol in 2012. Although the implementation of the Kyoto
Protocol has shown some limited achievements, but politically, this
protocol revealed that all countries can help to reduce greenhouse gas emission
and support sustainable development. In this sense, the principles as embedded
in the Kyoto Protocol are still valuable for consideration in
preparing the new agreement to tackle climate change. In general, Cambodia fully
support climate change resolution measures based on critical principles of the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change which includes ”joint responsibility, but to a different degree”, “different requirement and
unique situation of developing countries, especially, vulnerable countries to
climate change and their right to promote sustainable development” and
those preventive measures which allow them to take action even when science is
unavailable.
Indeed, it will
be difficult to expect a new agreement replacing the Kyoto Protocol at the end of this 15th Summit because there are many contrasting
views on the matter. However, we hope that all countries will agree on some
common points relating to the responsibility of each country in reducing
greenhouse gas emission, assisting the adaptation measures those countries
vulnerable to climate change, financing issue, transferring technology and
building capacity for developing countries, especially, for the LDCs.
LDCs are the
most vulnerable to climate change because their adaptation capacity is still
limited. Therefore, those countries should be the prime target for receiving
assistance, especially, for implementing their national sub-programs for
adaptation to climate change and the financing of their adaptation projects
should not be tied up with any condition at all based on the real circumstance
and need of each community and country. Currently, there is very little budget
of about $300 millions that can be used to finance adaptation activities at
developing countries compares to their annual requirement which is estimated to
be billions of dollars. In this sense, there should be a legal commitment in
financing adaptation activities for vulnerable countries to avoid adding extra
debt to those countries. For instance, countries as listed in Annex 1 of the
Convention on Climate Change should provide more financing to support expenses
of the adaptation activities in developing and vulnerable countries, which is
the contract under Article 4 of the Convention.
It is very
encouraging to know that recently the European Union has pledged and is
considering to provide a budget of 2 to 15 billion US Dollars annually to poor
countries for implementing their adaptation measures.
Relating to the
future agreement after the Kyoto Protocol, Cambodia fully supports
the reduction of greenhouse gas emission through avoiding forest degradation and
destruction and forest conservation because the loss of tropical forest has
contributed to about 20% of gas emission annually around the world. However, the
success of this mechanism could be assured only with a good incentive scheme,
justice and justified economic cost of legal relative to illegal use of forest.
In addition to carbon absorption, forest protection and conservation brought a
lot of benefits to community, country and the world. They include non-timber
forest products for community, protecting watershed, regulating water level,
fertilizing land, absorbing rain water, correcting weather condition, conserving
biodiversities, etc. Local community should be the ultimate beneficiaries from
this sort of projects. However, allocation of resources to transform forest into
carbon absorbed reservoir should not compete with effort to promote the
reduction of green house gas emission, which has been done by promoting
renewable energy, energy efficiency, technology transfer to poor countries as
well as the effort of developed countries to reduce emissions.
The effort of
either reducing green-house gas emission or adapting to climate change could not
be success without transfer modern technology to developing countries,
especially to the least developing countries. This is well taken in Article IV
of Climate Change Convention and Bali Roadmap.
This is a win-win solution for the world climate because developing countries
could bypass traditional method of economic development, instead they increase
efficiency, reduce environmental pollution and green-house gas to support
sustainable socio-economic development. Nevertheless, market mechanism failed to
encourage technology transfer, because it is driven by profit and does not have
any mechanism to add environmental impacts. Moreover, new technologies that do
less harm to environment are expensive and protected by global patens, which is
a reason of less attractiveness to private sector. In this regards, measures
based on supply-demand are not sufficient to drive technology transfer. To fill
out the gap, governments of developed world should take more actions to ensure
that climate-friendly technology could be transferred to developing countries.
In short, monitoring and market mechanism are two complementary measures for
technology transfer under UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. However,
they should transfer technologies as an excuse to get rid of obsolete
technologies that are harmful to human, climate or experiment of unreliable
technologies, which its impacts are unpredictable. Technology transfer should be
comprehensive by including specialized tools, information, capacity building and
financial resources. In this regards, South-South cooperation should be added to
North-South Cooperation to encourage for technology transfer with low cost.
Climate change
is a result of market failure. Open cycle of market system is following: extract
natural resources, produce, consume, emit back to the environment. The absent of
mechanism to include environmental impacts to cost of production and
proliferation of consumerism culture worldwide lead to excessively extract of
natural resources, especially fossil fuel, and emit green-house gas to a highest
level of human history. This life-and-dead challenge is a historic test from
human being to show their capabilities to survive their lives and civilizations.
In this regard, an individual, an institution, a country has their respective
role to address this life-and-dead issue according to its abilities,
competencies, roles, responsibilities and its contributions to the causes of
these issues.
In context of
Cambodia, the immediate priority are following: prepare policy, strategy and
action plan on climate change; streamline climate change into sectoral policy
and plan; create climate change fund to mobilize resources for implementing
projects on adaptation to climate change and reducing green-house gas emission;
strengthen institution and technical capacity, cooperation and coordination and
research studies; strengthen role of private sector, and prepare to join the 15th summit of members of Climate Change Convention.
With limited
capacities and resources, but with high policy commitment, Cambodia is ready to
contribute and share responsibilities to future of human being with world effort
to address issue of climate change following the principles of UN Framework
Convention for Climate Change. We strongly hope that commitment from Cambodia
would inspire similar commitment from our development partner.
I believe that
the next two days forum would offer a good venue for us to understand, learn and
discuss on some important topics that lead to some pragmatic recommendations
that could be used to support sustainable development under framework of climate
change.
Finally, I would
like to wish you all the four gems of Buddhist blessing: Longevity, Nobility,
Happiness and Strength and I would like to declare the opening of the First
National Forum on Climate Change.
EndItem. |
|